Left to
right: BAKE, POACH, GRILL, FRY
BAKING: Roasting really and this
isn't rocket science so as per the
above. Quite a bit of run off of fat
in to the dish. The taste was
drier and the bite, well you could
feel a slight bagginess. The skins
though noticeably toughened,
wrinkled up (no splits) and the
weight loss the highest of all the
methods was 26% (see table below).
POACHING: OK this is not just
poaching as it involved frying off
at the end in a hot pan, and the
results were interesting as the
skins were less tough than the BAKE
and the GRILL but the sausage was
very moist and succulent. Noticeable
was a small number of oil droplets
in the water that will have been
released from the sausage and when
drained there was a definite
"paleness". When fried off though,
the colouring changed dramatically.
No splits. Weight loss 8%.
GRILLING: This is broiling for
non-UK peeps. I see that "heat from
above" = Broiling, and "heat from
beneath" = Grilling. So as I'm in
the UK, I bunged it under the grill!
The skin toughened, with a minor
split, the bite was firmer and the
taste became sharper. Quite a bit of
run off of fat in to the grill pan.
Weight loss 18%.
FRYING: Using our normal sampling
method results were much the same as
when we tested these sausages in May
2012. Good taste and medium bite/soft(ish)
skin. Minor split. Weight loss 9%.
Method | Before | After | Net |
Bake | 75g | 55g | -26% |
Poach | 72g | 66g | -8% |
Grill | 75g | 61g | -18% |
Fry | 75g | 68g | -9% |
So what's the
preference? Well the
POACHING method did produce a really
succulent result with similar weight
loss to frying, no splits or
ruptures but the extra "work" and
saucepan/thermometer time was a
pain. If you've got the time Sausage
Review can confirm that this method
works.
Let's face it though, FRYING for us
when doing our sampling is still the
most effective, splits and all, but
each to their own I suppose...
You may also like to see:
Share this review: